Malpractice
COVER YOUR TAIL
The most common form of malpractice insurance is claims-made coverage. With claims-made malpractice insurance, you pay a premium for a specific term, and you are covered for claims that arise during the policy period.
The policy period ends.
You leave.
You don't renew.
A claim arises.
When did the act occur?
During the insured period.
Covered or not?
NOT.
How do you cover yourself?
How do you cover your rear?
You buy a tail.
The tail covers any claims brought after the period covered by the claims-made insurance. Typically, the tail becomes due when a doctor leaves the state of the area, or if a doctor changes professional liability carriers. This coverage is very expensive.
So, if your contract says only that, "We will provide for malpractice insurance," then it is up to the court to decide. To avoid the hassle, make sure your contract states who will be responsible for the costs of the tail insurance in the event of termination.
Who should pay for the tail ? you are the employer? If the employer says that you, the employee, should pay for the tail, try to negotiate.
You worked for your employer. Whatever happened while you were employed may have been a function of something you did or didn't do, but your employer had some responsibility.
More and more contracts are saying the tail costs will be shared 50-50 between employer and employee in the event of termination.
WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OCCURRENCE COVERAGE AND CLAIMS MADE MALPRACTICE INSURANCE COVERAGE?
An occurrence policy provides coverage for a claim that occurs during the policy period, regardless of when the claim is reported.
For example, let's assume you carry a malpractice policy from December 1, 1999 to November 30, 2000 and it is an occurrence policy. You never renew your policy. On August 16, 2001 you receive notice that you have been named in a malpractice lawsuit for something that happened on February 4, 2000. Because the incident occurred during your coverage period, you would be covered for that claim, even though you received notice of the claim after your policy ended. A claims-made policy provides coverage for an incident that occurs during an active policy period only if the calim is also filed during an active policy period.
Suppose you have a claims made policy from December 1, 1999 to November 30, 2000 and do not renew that policy. On August 16, 2001 you receive notice that you have been named in a malpractice lawsuit for something that happened on February 4, 2000. You would not have coverage under your claims made policy because your coverage was not active when the claim was made.
If you own a claims-made policy, you may need to give some additional thought before you decide to cancel or non-renew your policy. If you decide to end a claims-made policy, you can purchase "tail" coverage. Tail coverage will extend the time that a claim can be reported, but the incident will still need to occur while the policy was active.
Return to TOP
| |
| In a nutshell, the states that offer some form of caps are: Alabama, Alaska, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, & Wisconsin. |
| |
| Note: This information is from 2003. Remember that medical liability reform is in contention in many states and court decisions are frequently reversed or reinstated. Please check at http://www.atra.org/reforms/ and the invaluable Liability Crisis Map at the AMA: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/noindex/category/11871.html. |
| |
| State |
Caps |
Limits on Damages (Active Limits are in Bold Type) |
| Alabama |
Yes |
1987 (Ala. Code Sec. 6-5-544;547) $400,000 limit on non-economic damages, including punitive damages, $1 million limit on wrongful death actions. The Alabama Supreme Court ruled the noneconomic damages portion of the statute unconstitutional in Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Association, No. 89-1087, Sp & 27, 1991. |
| Alaska |
Yes |
1986 (Alaska Stat. Sec. 09.17.010) Personal injury awards for noneconomic losses may not exceed $500,000. This limit does not apply to damages for disfigurement or severe physical impairment." |
| Arizona |
No |
|
| Arkansas |
No |
|
| California |
Yes |
1975 (Cal. Civ. Code Sec. 3333.2) Noneconomic damages limited to $250,000. The California Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of this limit in Fein v. Permanente Medical Group, 695 P.2d 665 (1985). |
| Colorado |
Yes |
1990 (Colo. Rev. Stat. Sec. 13-64-302.5) Plaintiff may not recover punitive damages against a physician for adverse outcome of prescription drug where FDA protocol followed. 1991 expanded to include medically prescribed drugs or products used on an experimental bases. 1989 (Colo. Rev. Stat. Sec. 13-21-203) Permissible recovery for wrongful death limited to $250,000. |
| |
|
AMENDED 1989-1986 (Colo. Rev. Stat. Sec. 13-21-102.5)1988 (Colo. Rev. Stat. Sec. 13-64-302) Noneconomic damages limited to $250,000. Court may find clear justification to increase limit to $500,000 for noneconomic loss in certain situations. The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of this statute in Scholz v. Metropolitan and Pathologists, P.C., No. 92-8A277, Co. Supreme Court, April 26, 1993. |
| Connecticut |
No |
|
| Delaware |
No |
1976 (Del. Code. Ann. tit. 18, Sec. 6855) Punitive damages may be awarded only on finding of malicious intent to injure or willful or wanton misconduct. |
| DC |
No |
|
| Florida |
No |
1988 (Fla. Stat. Sec. 766.207, 209) Where parties agree to voluntary binding arbitration, (1) net economic damages for wage loss are limited to 80 percent of wages loss and earning capacity; (2) noneconomic damages are limited to a maximum of $250,000 with percentage basis "calculated on a percentage basis with respect to capacity to enjoy life." Where the plaintiff refuses to arbitrate, noneconomic damages, including but not limited to past common and future medical expenses, may not exceed 80 percent of plaintiff's loss of wages and earning capacity, offset by collateral sources. No limits where defendant refuses to arbitrate. (not to exceed $350,000) The $250,000 limit and the $350,000 limit were held unconstitutional University Miami School of Medicine v. Echarte, no. 90-982, Fla. App. Ct. , 3rd district, June 11, 1991. Supposedly there is a $350k cap, but jurors can ignore the cap and award more if the doctor refuses to admit making a mistake - a double-edged sword for physicians. Powerful attorney and consumer groups in the area make it unlikely that Florida will see much reform in the near future. |
| Georgia |
No |
|
| Hawaii |
Yes |
1986 (Hawaii Rev. Stat. 663-8.7) Pain and suffering" damages limited to $375,000; pain and suffering does not include mental anguish, disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of consortium. |
| Idaho |
Yes |
1990 (Idaho Code 6-1606) Removed 1992 SUNSET from statute below. SUNSET 1992-1987 (Idaho Code 6-1603) Noneconomic damages in any tort action shall not exceed $400,000, unless personal injury caused by "willful or reckless misconduct" or circumstances that would constitute a felony. This cap shall increase or decrease yearly according to the state's adjustment of the average annual wage. Original statute applying limit only to medical liability cases was overturned Jones v. State Board of Medicine, 555 P.2d 399 (Idaho 19760 cert denied 431 U.S. 914 (1977). |
| Illinois |
No |
REPEALED 1979--1975 (Ill. Rev. Stat. Ch. 70 101) The maximum recovery for medical injury shall be $500,000. The Illinois Supreme Court struck down the $500,000 cap on grounds that it was "arbitrary" and a "special law" in violation of the state constitution. Wright v. Central Du Page Hospital Association, 347 N.E. 2d 736 (1976). 1985 (Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 110,2-1115) Punitive damages not recoverable. |
| Indiana |
Yes |
AMENDED 1989-1975 (Ind. Code 16-9.5-2-2) For acts after January 1, 1990, total medical liability damages limited to $750,000 (includes excess payments from PCF). For acts before or on January 1, 1990, $500,000 limit. Defendant must pay no more than $100,000 per practitioner per incident with a $300,000 annual aggregate limit. The Indiana Supreme Court upheld the state's limit on damage awards as constitutional. Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, 404 N.E. 2d 585 (1980), St. Anthony Medical v. Smith, no. 37A04-9010 CV-460, Ind. App. Ct., May 28, 1992,; Bova v. J.H. Roig, M.D., no. 56A03-9110-CV-313, Ind. App. Ct., 1st. Dist., December 7, 1992. |
| Iowa |
No |
|
| Kansas |
Yes |
1988 (Kan. Stat. Ann. 60-19a02) In personal injury actions accruing after July 1, 1988, the amount of noneconomic damages recoverable by each party from all defendants for all claims is limited to $250,000. |
| Kentucky |
No |
|
| Louisiana |
Yes |
1990 (La. Rev Stat. Ann. 40:1299.151-168) State will reimburse health care providers who provide charity care to more than 10 percent of their patients adjudged liable for actual damages. |
| |
|
1975 (La. Rev. Stat. Ann. 40:1299.42) The total amount of damages for all malpractice claims is limited to $500,000, plus interest and costs, exclusive of future medical care and related benefits. The Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the statute. Williams v. Kushner, slip. op., 88-C-1153, 88-C-1188 (September 12, 1989), hr'g. denied, 549 So. 2d 294 (1989), Butler v. Flint Goodrich Hospital of Dillard University, Supreme Court of Louisiana, no 92cc 0559, (4th circuit), October 19, 1992. |
| Maryland |
Yes |
AMENDED 1989-1986 (Md. Cts. & Jud, Proc. Code Ann. 11-108) In any action for damages for personal injury accruing after July 1, 1986, an award for non-economic damages may not exceed $350,000 which has a $500,000 limit, unless two or more beneficiaries in which case there is a $700,000 limit. |
| |
|
1993 - Part of a comprehensive health care reform package provides a defense from liability for physicians who adhere to standards of practice among health care professionals with similar training and experience in the same, or similar community. |
| Massachusetts |
Yes |
1986 (Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 231.60H) Medical liability damages limited to $500,000 total, unless the jury determines that there is a substantial or permanent loss or impairment of bodily function or substantial disfigurement, or other special circumstances which warrant a finding that the cap was unfair. If the total amount of general damages, from a single occurrence, for all plaintiffs exceeds $500,000, then the amount of such damages recoverable by each plaintiff will be reduced to a percentage of $500,000 proportionate to that plaintiff's share of the total amount of such damages for all plaintiffs. |
| Michigan |
Yes |
1986 (Mich. Comp. Laws 600.1483) Noneconomic damages in medical malpractice actions limited to $225,000 unless there has been a death, intentional tort, foreign object wrongfully left in body, injury to reproductive system, fraudulent concealment of injury by health care provider, limb or organ wrongfully removed and patient has lost a vital bodily function. The limit on noneconomic damages shall be increased each year by the increase in the consumer price index. |
| Minnesota |
Yes |
1990 (Minn. Stat. 549.20) Punitive damages may be awarded only upon a showing of willful indifference or deliberate disregard for care. 1986 (Minn. Stat. 549.23) Intangible loss awards may not exceed $400,000. Intangible losses are those for embarrassment, emotional distress, and loss consortium. |
| Mississippi |
No |
|
| Missouri |
Yes |
1986 (Mo. Rev. Stat. 538.210) Noneconomic damages in medical liability actions limited to $350,000 per occurrence from any one defendant. This limit is increased or decreased January 1st of each year in accordance with figures determined by the U.S. Department of Commerce. The Missouri Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of this statute in Adams v. Childrens Mercy Hospital, no. 73 867, Mo. Sup. Ct., May 19, 1991. As of 1993 limit stands at $465,000. |
| Montana |
Yes |
1978 (Mont. Code Ann. 27-1-310) Recovery of non-economic damages prohibited in breach of contract action unless breach resulted in physical injury. 1995 Amended (Mont. Code. Ann. 25-9-403 ) limits noneconomic damages in medical malpractice actions at $250,000. |
| Nebraska |
Yes |
AMENDED 1986--1976 (Neb. Rev. Stat. 44-2825) The total amount recoverable by a plaintiff against a health care provider, including amounts from the Excess Liability Fund, may not exceed one million dollars. Prior to 1985, limit was $500,000. The Nebraska Supreme court has upheld the constitutionality of this statute in Prendergast v. Nelson, 256 N.W. 2d 657 (1977). |
| Nevada |
No |
|
| New Hampshire |
No |
1986 (N.H. Rev. Stat. 508:4-d) Noneconomic damages limited to $250,000. The New Hampshire Supreme Court struck down the statute as unconstitutional Carson v. Maurer, 424 A. 2d 825 (1980). $875,000 limit on noneconomic damages found unconstitutional in Brannigan v. Usitalo, no. 90-377, N.H. Sup. Ct. March 13, 1991. |
| New Jersey |
No |
|
| New Mexico |
Yes |
1976 (N.M. Stat. Ann. 41-5-6; -7) The aggregated dollar limit recoverable may not exceed $500,000, except for punitive damages and medical care and related costs. Health care providers not liable for any amount over $100,000. Monetary damages for future medical expenses shall not be awarded in medical malpractice cases. In 1995, the limit will be raised to $600,000. |
| New York |
No |
|
| North Carolina |
No |
|
| North Dakota |
Yes |
1987 (N.D. Cent. Code 32-03.2-09) Awards over $250,000 may be subject to court review for reasonableness. A $300,000 limit on medical liability awards was struck down as unconstitutionalArneson v. Olson, 270 N.W. 2d 125 (N.D. 1978). Amended 1995 (N.D. Cent. Code 32-50-24.1) limits noneconomic damages in medical liability actions to $500,000. |
| Ohio |
No |
1975 (Ohio Rev. Code Ann. 2307.43) A $200,000 limit on general damages in medical claims was struck down as unconstitutional in Duren v. Suburban Community Hospital, 495 N. E. 2d (Court of Common Pleas 1985); Galayada v. Lake Hospital System, no. 63 151, Ohio App. Ct., 8th dist., Sept. 30, 1993. Jeanne and Chrystal v. The Hawks Hospital of Mt. Carmel, no. 90-AP-599, Ohio App. Ct., 10th Dist., May 23, 1991; Morris v. Savoy, no. 89-1807, Ohio Sup. Ct., August 27, 1991. |
| |
|
A $250,000 limit on noneconomic damages was found unconstitutional in Gladon v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, No. 64029, Ohio App. Ct., 8th App. Desk., Cuyahoga County, March 1, 1994. |
| Oklahoma |
No |
1976 (Okla. Stat. tit. 76,18) Any action for medical injury brought more than 3 years from date of injury shall be limited to actual medical and surgical expenses incurred, or to be incurred, as a direct result of such injury. The Oklahoma Supreme Court struck down the statute as unconstitutional Reynolds v. Porter, 760 P.2d 816 (Okla. 1988). |
| Oregon |
Yes |
1989 (Or. Rev. Stat. 18.550) No punitive damages awarded against licensed physician unless malice is shown. 1987 (Or. Rev. Stat. 18.560) Noneconomic damages in a personal injury action limited to $500,000. |
| Pennsylvania |
No |
|
| Rhode Island |
No |
|
| South Carolina |
No |
|
| South Dakota |
Yes |
1986 (S.D. Codified Laws Ann. 21.3-11) Total damages awarded by court or through binding arbitration may not exceed one million dollars. Prior to 1986 amendment, the limit on damages was $500,000. |
| Tennessee |
No |
|
| Texas |
Yes |
SUNSET 1993-1977 (Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 4509i, 11.02-.04) Medical injury liability limited to $500,000. Limit inapplicable to costs for past and future medical care. If the above limit is stricken by courts, the limit for noneconomic losses shall be $150,000. Limits to be decreased according to the consumer price index between the effective date of the statute and the time at which damages are awarded. The Texas Supreme Court struck down this statute as unconstitutional in Lucas v. United States, 757 S.W. 2d 687 (Tex. 1988). The Texas Supreme Court subsequently found the limit constitutional only in wrongful death cases in Rose v. Doctors Hosp., 801 S.W.2d 841 (Tex. 1990). |
| Utah |
Yes |
1986 (Utah Code Ann. 78-14-7.1) Noneconomic losses may not exceed $250,000. |
| Vermont |
No |
|
| Virginia |
Yes |
AMENDED 1983-1976 (Va. Code 8.01-581.15) Medical liability damages are limited to one million dollars. (Prior to 1983, limit was $750,000). The Virginia Supreme Court held this limit constitutional in Etheridge v. Medical Center Hospitals, 376 S.E.2d 525 (Va. 1989). |
| Washington |
No |
1986 (Wash. Rev. Code 4.56.250) Noneconomic damages in person injury suit may not exceed an amount determined by multiplying 0.43 by the average annual wage in Washington and by the life expectancy of the person incurring noneconomic damages. A plaintiff's life expectancy shall not be less that 15 years for the purpose of determining maximum noneconomic damages. The Washington Supreme Court struck down the statute as unconstitutional in Sofie v. Fibreboard Corporation, 771 P.2d 711 (Wash. 1989). |
| West Virginia |
Yes |
1986 (W. Va. Code 55-78-9) Noneconomic damages in a medical injury suit shall not exceed one million dollars and the jury must be so instructed. This statute was ruled constitutional in Robinson v. Charleston Area Medical Center, no. 20109, W. Va. Sup. Ct. App., December 20, 1991. |
| Wisconsin |
Yes |
1985 (Wis. Stat. 893.35) Noneconomic damages in a medical injury suit may not exceed one million dollars. This limit shall be annually adjusted to reflect changes in the consumer price index. Limit expired January 1, 1991. The Wisconsin Supreme Court affirmed that noneconomic damages are now unlimited in Jelenik v. The Saint Paul Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, No. 92-1858, Wis. Sup. Ct., March 14, 1994. Amended 1995 (Wis. Stat. 893.55 (4) (d) limits noneconomic damages in medical liability actions to $350,000 indexed for inflation. |
| Wyoming |
No |
|
|
Return to TOP |